> Lambdaj simply does not do this. "AdderOf" is an ordinary class, > "add" is an ordinary method, and "first" is an ordinary field of that > class. There is no expression in your example that defines a function > referencing a variable from the lexically enclosing scope.
The feature provided by lambdaj is exactly to "turn" the ordinary method AdderOf.add() into a closure. If I am missing something please show me a practical example where lambdaj cannot do the same of a "real" closure with the same semantic (and probably just a slightly uglier and more verbose syntax). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=.
