> I look forward to being corrected, but all the examples I've seen of > lambaj show things like: > > forEach(someCollection).setSomeMethod(withThis); > > Giving to mind that forEach() returns some dynamic proxy to > someCollection that iterates over it, calling the provided method, > which is great for somethings, but in almost 99% of the times I've > wanted a nice closure based syntax for this, I've wanted to call > multiple statements on each item, or refer to the 'each' as part of > that statement, such like: > > someCollection.forEach(each => each.value = each.value * 2); > > Unless theres something akin to how Mockito handles parameters I don't > see how they're comparable, does lambaj allow for something like: > > forEach(someCollection).setEach(each().getValue() * 2) > > with each() return a ThreadLocal bound value from each iteration? > > -- > Pull me down under...
Did you give a look at this? http://code.google.com/p/lambdaj/wiki/Closures -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=.
