Oops, wrong email. 

Well, I listened to podcast 301 and I have to say I agree somewhat with Joe's 
position. 

That is not particularly meaningful, but what is meaningful is that Joe 
expressed it(adamantly :). As a result the discussion turned out to be a good 
one. If there had only been patent bashers the discussion would not have been 
as meaningful. (or entertaining. :)

--- On Tue, 4/13/10, Rakesh <rakesh.mailgro...@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Rakesh <rakesh.mailgro...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Software Patents and Joe bashing
To: javaposse@googlegroups.com
Date: Tuesday, April 13, 2010, 12:51 PM

errrrrr...no

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Scott Melton <scott_rides_ag...@yahoo.com> 
wrote:


Are you by any chance  Rakesh Menon? If you are, I found your JavaFX site. 
Great examples. Thanks for publishing.


http://fxexperience.com/2009/11/text-effects/


--- On Sat, 4/10/10, Rakesh <rakesh.mailgro...@gmail.com> wrote:



From: Rakesh <rakesh.mailgro...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Software Patents and Joe bashing
To: javaposse@googlegroups.com


Date: Saturday, April 10, 2010, 12:48 PM

Hi Scott,

what insult to Joe are you referring to? Stating Joe has an Apple bias is not 
an insult but pretty much a fact that can be backed up with examples.



Sorry Scott but I can't help feeling you are , as we say in the UK, stirring. 



R

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Scott Melton <scott_rides_ag...@yahoo.com> 
wrote:






Do you really expect me to believe that one sentence from one letter from 
another country, taken out of context supports your assertion that patent 
lawyers are retarded(special needs, LOL) morons and idiots? I may resemble a 
young baboon but even I don't buy that one.





Regarding your post about Joe deserving the beating. Your rational falls well 
short of polite behavior. You say if he deserves it, I guess meaning it is 
true, it's ok for someone to insult and berate him? If someone personally 
insults someone else, then maybe your argument holds some water, even though 
I'd argue that retaliation in kind is usually not the best way to handle 
things. Fact is, he did not. He voiced his opinion and now you are telling me 
that because you think he is wrong he deserves to be personally insulted in 
public? I don't think so. Not even in my backyard.





Even if
 we were sitting in my backyard drinking beer and telling dirty jokes, try 
calling Willy Nelson a burned out old hippy. It may be true, but I doubt he'd 
cotton to it. (no, I don't know the burned out old hippy ;)





This isn't my backyard. It's a professional forum of your peers read by 
(possibly) thousands of people of all walks of life, burned into virtual stone 
for posterity to read and ponder. Women, children and people of other cultures 
who might find ugly or off color posts offensive or at least, unpleasant. Some 
people might be ok with them, thick skin and all, but it's these others that we 
should consider when we choose our wording.  





Or at least, that is my opinion, from my country, Texas, my culture, Texas, 
imposing my behavioral standards from Texas, blah blah blah...




Opinion sent from Mybacksideistan phone.


--- On Fri, 4/9/10, Reinier Zwitserloot <reini...@gmail.com>
 wrote:

From: Reinier Zwitserloot <reini...@gmail.com>




Subject: [The Java Posse] Re: Software Patents and Joe bashing
To: "The Java Posse" <javaposse@googlegroups.com>




Date: Friday, April 9, 2010, 3:45 AM

Nope. People who write these laws are retarded morons who get played
by lobbyists.

A british MP (something that bears some resemblance to a US senator or




house representative) recently wrote a letter to another MP to try to
convince her of the importance of a new law that, amongst many other
things, will bring a three-strikes-and-you're-out system to internet




access in the United Kingdom: If you get *accused* 3 times of breaking
copyright law, you get your internet disconnected. It's not quite -
that- dramatic, but that's not really the point. The letter included




the
 following text:

    An IP Address (Intellectual Property Address)

That's right. Apparently IP Address doesn't stand for Internet
Protocol Address anymore.

See. Idiots.

Regardless of whether the current patent system is good or bad, and




regardless of whether joe is being bashed, and regardless of whether
or not he deserves that, your point about the current law being made
by people 'infinitely more knowledgable than you' is only true if




you're a baby baboon with a learning difficulty. You seem to be able
to type, so, I doubt that.


On Apr 8, 6:12 pm, Scott Melton <scott_rides_ag...@yahoo.com> wrote:




> In a free and open society it is easy to find fault in complicated systems, 
> just as it is easy to have a bias, pick sides and misrepresent the facts. One 
> example in this
 thread, I may be wrong, but I think there is good reason for simplifying the 
patent granting process from who invented it first(which can be very difficult 
and costly to prove) to who filed first. Is the change a choice between the 
lesser of two weavels? Certainly. Infinitely more knowledgeable people than I 
made the decision. I will side with them until I become a patent lawyer or 
become so well informed that I can pass judgment on this complicated system.




>
> On to the Joe bashing or un-bashing if you will. Everyone has a bias. If you 
> think you do not then you are biased toward the delusional. I enjoy the 
> spirited discussions on the Java Posse podcast and think it is crucial to 
> have them. If a bias surfaces from time to, (Apple, UNIX!, Windows) that is 
> fine with me. I am lucky to know where they sit, before they tell me where 
> they stand.




>
> The Posse members take extreme measures to inform people about where they 
> sit. They do
 an exemplary job of presenting the issues in a well thought out, open, 
balanced and professional manner. Knowing their bias(or assuming I do) 
sometimes helps me understand their position more clearly.
>
> Having listened to over half of the podcasts, I have come to the conclusion 
> that the format is an easy, open and professional one. It is easy to listen 
> to, very informative and sometimes as fun as a barrel of monkeys. (That is a 
> whole lot of fun!) For someone to personally criticize and insult a member 
> for having a bias and not conforming to their way of thinking(right or wrong) 
> is non-productive and unnecessary(unwanted?) in this format.




>
> That is my opinion. Take it or leave it. There is no reason to personally 
> criticize or insult me for it.
>
> Apologies for high jacking this thread,
> Scott Melton
>
> Opinion sent from my ASS phone.





-- 
You received this message because you are
 subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com.


To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.


For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.








      



-- 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.

To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com.

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.


For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.








-- 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.

To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com.

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.


For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.






      



-- 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.

To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com.

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.


For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.








-- 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.

To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com.

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.


For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.






      

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to