On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Casper Bang <casper.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Erm... SWT == cross platform UI bindings... with platform-specific > implementations. That it's not included in the JRE just means it's less > likely to be bloated and over-engineered. ;-) > > There may be bindings for multiple platforms, but it still represents > a rejection of the ways sanctioned by Sun in not being vanilla Java. > How so? AWT contains native bindings as well, SWT just uses them more wisely (i.e. using native controls instead of emulating them, which is the main reason why Swing was never found fit to develop credible desktop applications). -- Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
