ASF: That code doesn't come from Harmony: https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/read_beyond_the_headers
On Oct 29, 4:14 pm, Fabrizio Giudici <fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it> wrote: > On 10/29/2010 04:00 PM, Greg Reddin wrote:> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 4:50 AM, > Fabrizio Giudici > > <fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it> wrote: > >> 3. Would be the FSF entitled for asking to release the whole Harmony under > >> the GPL (+CPE) license? In cascade, wouldn't be Google forced to do the > >> same? And, this is my point, couldn't be this the strategy by Oracle > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think anybody has to ask. The > > Apache License gives permission to fork under any license, right? For > > that matter since Android is Apache-licensed, if that's what Oracle > > was after, then why don't they just fork it? > > Because I don't think they are searching for a fork - they want to > control it as a part of Java. > > -- > f.g. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
