> So because CPUs are fast enough today we need to invent something to waste > cpu cycles again..? Have you got Intel shares ?
I simply flipped your own argument to show it was pointless, what you may consider unfeasible today is trivial tomorrow. Mainstream CPU's with 16-32 cores are right around the corner, yet you insist making overhead and lack of speed a primary argument. > Given significant parts of Dotnet are worthless without COM We are talking about the VM's and bytecode here, not specific libraries or how they are implemented. Part of .NET may delegate to COM underneath, but that's a completely orthogonal matter. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
