On Nov 30, 2:48 pm, Kevin Wright <kev.lee.wri...@gmail.com> wrote: > People are free to agree or disagree with this model. I only replied> > because Kevin suggested it is illegal (as in: "grounds for a > > government anti-trust investigation"). > > Not quite... I merely stated that the problem with Apple's behaviour is > closer in nature to an anti-trust violation than it is to a restriction of > free speech - not that such a violation had actually occurred.
Sorry if I misunderstood you - you said: "So I'm sure that some suitable definition of monopoly could be found if the US government felt a need to slap Apple on the wrist." -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javapo...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
