On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Reinier Zwitserloot <reini...@gmail.com>wrote:
> The one thing in all those needless deviations from Java in that Project > Ceylon project that I actually thought might just be worth doing was := for > assignment. > I'm a bit sad about this actually, because I think that Fantom's use of := makes more sense (:= indicates that you want type inference). For mutability, I prefer Scala's more explicit var/val distinction over Ceylon's arbitrary choice of := (which is surprising since Gavin made a point to make Ceylon much more obvious about keywords than Scala overall, but it fails in this specific case). -- Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
