On 3 May 2011 08:52, Reinier Zwitserloot <reini...@gmail.com> wrote: > The one thing in all those needless deviations from Java in that Project > Ceylon project that I actually thought might just be worth doing was := for > assignment. > > Prolog got it right; If ever there was a language that's overdue for a revival...
Op dinsdag 3 mei 2011 17:06:09 UTC+2 schreef kirk het volgende: > >> >> > >> > Why did anyone ever think that assignment should look so much like >> asserting equality? It never fails to cause problems... >> >> +1 >> >> >> Kirk >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > -- Kevin Wright gtalk / msn : kev.lee.wri...@gmail.com <kev.lee.wri...@gmail.com>mail: kevin.wri...@scalatechnology.com vibe / skype: kev.lee.wright quora: http://www.quora.com/Kevin-Wright twitter: @thecoda "My point today is that, if we wish to count lines of code, we should not regard them as "lines produced" but as "lines spent": the current conventional wisdom is so foolish as to book that count on the wrong side of the ledger" ~ Dijkstra -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
