On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Moandji Ezana <mwa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In my definition, Maven Central, Github and build tools count as code > reuse, and I think the grade is a lot higher than F. Thanks, Moandji, I was going to say just that: Maven is probably the finest example of code reuse taken to a point that's never been reached in the software industry before. .net seems to be behind in these terms, but COM scores decently on that scale, albeit not as high as Maven. Having said that, this is library reuse, which is important but not the only concept. It's important because it enables reuse of huge code bases. The other aspect, code reuse, is a more debatable aspect, although I think Java probably still scores pretty high compared to other languages in that area (COM is a better mechanism IMO). -- Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
