Well, in my day job it's Java 1.5 still. In any case it was meant as a joke.
Seriously, I believe that for many Java programmers not exposed to FP at school (as it was for me) reasoning about anonymous inner classes was the road to understanding functions back in the time when "java & lambda" was an oxymoron. On Sunday, April 7, 2013 11:49:22 AM UTC+2, Russel wrote: > > On Sun, 2013-04-07 at 00:52 -0700, Marco Faustinelli wrote: > […] > > programming. You may like it a lot if your Java is already going that > way > > (I mean: you're already tweaking anonymous inner classes everywhere you > can > > :-) > > Who uses anonymous inner classes for functional programming in Java any > more? Aren't you already using lambda expressions throughout your code? > > -- > Russel. > ============================================================================= > > Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: > sip:russ...@ekiga.net<javascript:> > 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: > rus...@winder.org.uk<javascript:> > London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java Posse" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
