On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 10:39 -0700, phil swenson wrote: > cayla has no checkins for month, not exactly promising for new web > framework
On the other hand it hasn't had checkins for a month which might mean there is no churn. > i looked at kara a month ago or so, looks super early. Indeed. As does Cayla :-) > my point was really about having a reasonable mature web framework to work > with.... plugin architecture ecosystem, testing, build, deployment, etc. JSF is mature, plugin architecture ecosystem, testing, build, deployment, etc. but would you use it? > Play seems way beyond these particular frameworks. I can deploy play to > heroku, load of plugins for Play for auth/SaSS/etc. But it is based on a language that is over 10 years old ;-) I can deploy Django, Tornado, Flask, Vert.x, Grails, Ratpack, etc. to Heroku: Heroku is fairly platform agnostic and is therefore not a factor of choice. > I should clarify, this is just my impression - I haven't done anything > serious with Play. Decision making requires comparative work. Without projects implemented in all the frameworks, choice is based on what can only be called prejudice. At times this can be fine: if a team knows JSF, Play, Grails, and choose to just use it, fine. But if the question is "which is best", or "what the comparison between" then data is required, prejudice is no longer a valid tool. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java Posse" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
