Just went through the download for the IBM 1.3 JDK for Linux. It put me through the same license is for the JDK and thier JAAS stuff. I'm no lawyer, but I read a bunch of stuff in the license about the conditions under which it could be distributed, and it didn't sound too unreasonable. Did I miss something? Wong Kok Wai wrote: > IBM has released versions of JAAS as part of their JDK 1.3 for Linux and > Windows. But the license forbids distribution. > > Oleg Nitz wrote: > > > BTW, JAAS 1.0 from SUN is a "non-commercial reference implementation". > > Using it in jBoss makes the latter also "for non-commercial use only". > > Any comments on this? > > Does anybody know about other JAAS implementations? > >
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Security? Andy Lewis
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Security? marc fleury
- Re[2]: [jBoss-Dev] Security? Oleg Nitz
- RE: Re[2]: [jBoss-Dev] Security? marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Security? Wong Kok Wai
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Security? Andy Lewis
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Security? Andy Lewis
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Security? marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Security? Andy Lewis
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Security? Dan OConnor
- Re[2]: [jBoss-Dev] Security? Andy Lewis
- Re[2]: [jBoss-Dev] Security? roman seidl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Security? Rickard �berg
- Re[2]: [jBoss-Dev] Security? roman seidl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Security? danch
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Security? Dan OConnor
- Re[2]: [jBoss-Dev] Security? roman seidl
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Security? Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Security? Pranab Dhar
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Security? Rickard �berg
- [jBoss-Dev] Security? roman seidl
