On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Peter Donald wrote: > Other stuff (like jndi) is questionably GPLable. Because you target for a > 1.2 VM (where JNDI is an extention) you can not GPL it in that case but in > 1.3 where it is part of the runtime it is okay. > > Hell - I am not even sure that any class importing ejb package is GPLable. You seemed to be sure earlier that is ok to link against the "platform" (J2EE-J2SE-J2ME) that is J2EE in this case.. this includes JTA, JMS, EJB, JavaMail, JNDI etc. JMX is not yet included though JSR77 seems to indicate its a candiate for J2EE 1.4 spec. -- Juha
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update marc fleury
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update marc fleury
- RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update marc fleury
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Dan OConnor
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Dan OConnor
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat updat... Juha-P Lindfors
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat updat... Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat ... Dan OConnor
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tom... Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on... Dan OConnor
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on... Peter Donald
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on... Dan OConnor
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on... Rickard �berg
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on... Dan OConnor
- Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on... Peter Donald
