Cool,
The mainline is 2.4? What happened to 2.3? Anyways, I'll check this code
in as soon as I figure out how to use WinCVS with SourceForge(I'm looking at
Simone's directions from the dev-list archives). Hey, my first
checkin!(Well isn't that SPEciAaaal?!).
Bill
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
> fleury
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 2:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread
>
>
>
>
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan
> |Christopherson
> |Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 2:01 PM
> |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] FW: Busy wait on one thread
> |
> |
> |On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Bill Burke wrote:
> |
> |>
> |> Again, IMHO, these race condition fixes can't wait until JBoss
> |3.0 since it
> |> sounds like 3.0 won't be ready until August/September?
> |>
> |
> |I agree with Bill here - the race condition fix really does need to be in
> |2.4 (maybe even 2.2.x). 3.0 Should get a more aggressive rewrite of the
> |synchronization interceptor (multiple instances per bean, etc.)
>
> yeah yeah yeah....
>
> get the code in, of course 2.4 should be patched.
>
> marcf
>
>
>
> |
> |-danch
> |
> |
> |_______________________________________________
> |Jboss-development mailing list
> |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
