How about from the home page, under resources place a Jboss-Petstore link?
Im sort of at a loss myself in this case. It doesnt fit in on the binary page really... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >hey, > >where would you guys see the link for petstore, I am drawing a blank on >where it would fit on the current website, maybe under downloads? >documentation? (just to make sure people can see it running) under "success >stories"... I dont know any ideas? > >marcf > >|-----Original Message----- >|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason >|Dillon >|Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 8:03 PM >|To: Allen Fogleson >|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.0 Demo App >| >| >|Is this meant for JBoss developers (those that contribute to JBoss) or for >|User developers (those that use JBoss to run there J2EE/JMX applications)? >| >|--jason >| >| >|On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Allen Fogleson wrote: >| >|> The "problem" here is that the quickstart is meant to show developers >|> how to get started fast. I believe this was the first concern of those >|> asking for the demo apps. There is already the petstore app running on >|> Jboss to show full E-Commerce style abilities. Im not against donating a >|> full app mind you, I just think that the work behind it could be better >|> spent developing several smaller apps (in the spirit of tomcats >|> "examples" webapp) . >|> >|> My thinking here is twofold. >|> >|> 1) the purpose of a quickstart is to get developers up and running >|> quickly. A full blown application wont really do this. Plus it fits in >|> more to the model of the inexpensive documentation. Where the small apps >|> fit in with the free docs part. >|> >|> 2) A full app would only assist some places in "selling" Jboss to a >|> limited audience. I had meetings with 2 prospective clients in the past >|> week and both have asked ME about Jboss. Granted it is on my resume and >|> such as a technology I have used, but these people knew what it was. One >|> in fact wondered why they didnt use jboss instead of weblogic >|> (Especially after I told him about the features that will be in 3.0) >|> Sorry BEA, you guys might lose that one :) >|> >|> Im not against helping out on a full application as I said before, but I >|> think the initial thrust should be in the direction of a quickstart kind >|> of thing. These are not really intensely documented apps, but more along >|> the lines of little examples that show how to use (at least at a basic >|> level) Jboss 3. >|> >|> I actually like the model Marc is using now. It makes sense to me. I >|> like the idea that even though I am willing to submit stuff for free, >|> when it comes to the more advanced stuff there might be some >|renumeration. >|> >|> Al >|> >|> >|> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >|> >|> >I've been doing a few hours of thinking and came to a >|conclusion for a demo >|> >app. >|> > >|> >Would anyone like to assist me in creating an E-Bay style bidding >|> >application? >|> > >|> >James Hicks >|> > >|> >_______________________________________________ >|> >Jboss-development mailing list >|> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >|> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development >|> > >|> >|> >|> >|> _______________________________________________ >|> Jboss-development mailing list >|> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >|> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development >|> >| >| >|_______________________________________________ >|Jboss-development mailing list >|[EMAIL PROTECTED] >|https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
