Perhaps a new sub-section on the users site for "Demos". --jason
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, marc fleury wrote: > hey, > > where would you guys see the link for petstore, I am drawing a blank on > where it would fit on the current website, maybe under downloads? > documentation? (just to make sure people can see it running) under "success > stories"... I dont know any ideas? > > marcf > > |-----Original Message----- > |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason > |Dillon > |Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 8:03 PM > |To: Allen Fogleson > |Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 3.0 Demo App > | > | > |Is this meant for JBoss developers (those that contribute to JBoss) or for > |User developers (those that use JBoss to run there J2EE/JMX applications)? > | > |--jason > | > | > |On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Allen Fogleson wrote: > | > |> The "problem" here is that the quickstart is meant to show developers > |> how to get started fast. I believe this was the first concern of those > |> asking for the demo apps. There is already the petstore app running on > |> Jboss to show full E-Commerce style abilities. Im not against donating a > |> full app mind you, I just think that the work behind it could be better > |> spent developing several smaller apps (in the spirit of tomcats > |> "examples" webapp) . > |> > |> My thinking here is twofold. > |> > |> 1) the purpose of a quickstart is to get developers up and running > |> quickly. A full blown application wont really do this. Plus it fits in > |> more to the model of the inexpensive documentation. Where the small apps > |> fit in with the free docs part. > |> > |> 2) A full app would only assist some places in "selling" Jboss to a > |> limited audience. I had meetings with 2 prospective clients in the past > |> week and both have asked ME about Jboss. Granted it is on my resume and > |> such as a technology I have used, but these people knew what it was. One > |> in fact wondered why they didnt use jboss instead of weblogic > |> (Especially after I told him about the features that will be in 3.0) > |> Sorry BEA, you guys might lose that one :) > |> > |> Im not against helping out on a full application as I said before, but I > |> think the initial thrust should be in the direction of a quickstart kind > |> of thing. These are not really intensely documented apps, but more along > |> the lines of little examples that show how to use (at least at a basic > |> level) Jboss 3. > |> > |> I actually like the model Marc is using now. It makes sense to me. I > |> like the idea that even though I am willing to submit stuff for free, > |> when it comes to the more advanced stuff there might be some > |renumeration. > |> > |> Al > |> > |> > |> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > |> > |> >I've been doing a few hours of thinking and came to a > |conclusion for a demo > |> >app. > |> > > |> >Would anyone like to assist me in creating an E-Bay style bidding > |> >application? > |> > > |> >James Hicks > |> > > |> >_______________________________________________ > |> >Jboss-development mailing list > |> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > |> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > |> > > |> > |> > |> > |> _______________________________________________ > |> Jboss-development mailing list > |> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > |> > | > | > |_______________________________________________ > |Jboss-development mailing list > |[EMAIL PROTECTED] > |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
