It has been sitting on sourceforge since last night. See the Files
page.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Heath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "JBoss Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 5:47 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Support for upackaged EARs, JARs, WARs added to 2.4


> On Sun, 9 Dec 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
>
> > [snip]
>
> > I'll put out a new 2.4.4 beta tomorrow with this capability included to
> > allow for
> > additional testing.
>
> It's past tomorrow, yet no release(no rush, this isn't the point of my
mail).
> I'm really anticipating using the new feature of deploying unpacked ears,
> wars, and jars.
>
> Have you given thought to better versioning of the releases?  For example:
>
> 2.4.3 < 2.4.4 < 2.4.4beta
>
> Ie, 2.4.4beta is a higher version string than 2.4.4, according to dpkg.  I
> don't know rpm's version compare, but my gut instinct says it's done the
same
> way.  Could anyone confirm?  (this is a minor point, I can deal with it as
it
> currently is)
>
> To make the 2.4.4beta work in Debian's system, I have to call it:
>
> 2.4.3.99-2.4.4beta-1
>
> Where 2.4.3.99-2.4.4beta is the upstream version, and -1 is the local
Debian
> revision.
>
> This version string is ugly, at best.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>


_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to