On 2002.02.22 18:59:02 -0500 Jason Dillon wrote: > I don't *think* there is any need for this to be in the ObjectName. It > looks like it would be better suited for an Attribute of the Deployment > object (or whatever they are called). > > If we want to keep this, then I think an attriibute should be used for > full path and have the ON use only the filename.
How do you assure uniqueness? nothing stops you from deploying lots of jars all with the same file name, even within one ear. I'm definitely open to suggestions, however I would like to easily identify what application a mbean represents. btw I fixed this by replacing all : with % and including the protocol again. david jencks > > --jason > > > Adrian Brock wrote: > > >Yet again the windows file url rears it ugly head :-) > > > >This time it is in EJBDeployer. > >The ejbmodule has had it's ObjectName changed to > >include the url.getPath(); > > > >On windows this url is > >/C:/some/path/myapp.jar > > > >The : means the ObjectName is invalid and nothing deploys :-( > > > >Is this data informational? Can we just strip the > >drive part? > > > >Regards, > >Adrian > > > >_________________________________________________________ > >View thread online: http://main.jboss.org/thread.jsp?forum=66&thread=9433 > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Jboss-development mailing list > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
