On 2002.02.22 19:26:10 -0500 Jason Dillon wrote:
> Don't have a good answer for ya.  Perhaps include th parent deployable 
> name when nesting?  Else shouldn't the file system namespace cover 
> uniquness for deployables?
> 
Thats why I'm including the entire path, and now protocol. For an
ejb-module, there may be no parent deployable.  These long object names are
for ejb-module mbeans that I just invented yesterday, not ejb container
mbeans.

david jencks

> --jason
> 
> 
> David Jencks wrote:
> 
> >On 2002.02.22 18:59:02 -0500 Jason Dillon wrote:
> >
> >>I don't *think* there is any need for this to be in the ObjectName.  It
> 
> >>looks like it would be better suited for an Attribute of the Deployment
> 
> >>object (or whatever they are called).
> >>
> >>If we want to keep this, then I think an attriibute should be used for 
> >>full path and have the ON use only the filename.
> >>
> >
> >How do you assure uniqueness? nothing stops you from deploying lots of
> jars
> >all with the same file name, even within one ear.  I'm definitely open
> to
> >suggestions, however I would like to easily identify what application a
> >mbean represents.
> >
> >btw I fixed this by replacing all : with % and including the protocol
> >again.
> >
> >david jencks
> >
> >>--jason
> >>
> >>
> >>Adrian Brock wrote:
> >>
> >>>Yet again the windows file url rears it ugly head :-)
> >>>
> >>>This time it is in EJBDeployer.
> >>>The ejbmodule has had it's ObjectName changed to
> >>>include the url.getPath();
> >>>
> >>>On windows this url is
> >>>/C:/some/path/myapp.jar
> >>>
> >>>The : means the ObjectName is invalid and nothing deploys :-(
> >>>
> >>>Is this data informational? Can we just strip the
> >>>drive part?
> >>>
> >>>Regards,
> >>>Adrian
> >>>
> >>>_________________________________________________________
> >>>View thread online: http://main.jboss.org/thread.jsp?forum=66&thread=9433
> >>>
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>Jboss-development mailing list
> >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Jboss-development mailing list
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> >>
> >>
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Jboss-development mailing list
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> >
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to