You mean the system /tmp ?

--jason


Hiram Chirino wrote:

>> From: David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: jboss-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: [JBoss-dev] No more unpacking!! (jboss 3)
>> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 21:33:59 -0500
>>
>> Well, after a couple of bug fixes, Hiram's njar protocol works fine.  I
>> have the MainDeployer working using it instead of unpacking into tmp.
>>
>
> Cool.
>
>> Does anyone object to my committing this?
>>
>> Note that Hiram's protocol handler works by unpacking things into temp
>> files (in the system temp dir).  However, it's all hidden, and 
>> presumably
>> will avoid the security /permissions concerns.
>>
>
> We could make it so that the temp files are stored to the /tmp 
> directory.  That way the user can better manage the temp files that 
> jboss creates.
>
>> I'll also implement Scott's suggestion of removing the random numbers 
>> and
>> including the entire path of the original url.  (This is not as 
>> unique as
>> numbers, but it is unlikely anyone will deploy 2 packages with the same
>> url.getFile() value.)
>>
>> I'm also going to have another try at installing native libraries.  Any
>> ideas about where they should be unpacked to?
>>
>> Thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Jboss-development mailing list
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development




_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to