I can't find a Rel_3_0_0_5, do you mean Rel_3_0_0_4? --jason
Scott M Stark wrote: >>>If its a bunch of changes we might need to rollback tag it with >>>Rel_3_0_0_5. >>> >>Adds one file, modifies MainDeployer, and I think it may require a change >>in the web stuff - it turns out to break the web integration tests, I >>haven't looked why yet. >> >Not required to tag then. Not sure why the web integration test >should break here. > >>>The question here is will it work with the standard codebase syntax. >>> >What > >>>is the most nested url we allow for an ejb-jar and war? sar/ear/ejb? >>>I'm working on security manager permission tests and I can add tests of >>>the njar url codebase usage in permissions. >>> >>I really have no clue about these permission things. There is no >>theoretical limit to how deeply nested this stuff can get. sar/ear/rar/jar >>is plausible: ear/rar/jar is required by spec. If I commit this can you >>investigate the security stuff? >> >Yes. > >>>A 'native' directory under the deployment package directory makes sense >>>to me. >>> >>where? I'm thinking of for instance native libs in rars. I was thinking >>tmp/native. >> >Fine. > > > >_______________________________________________ >Jboss-development mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
