Good points Tom.

Do you do your optimistic lock check on both ejbLoad and ejbStore?

I suggest using the following container configuration with your optimistic locking scheme.  If you try it out, let me know how it works out.

Thanks,

 

Bill



 
<container-configuration>
        <container-name>Standard CMP EntityBean</container-name>
        <call-logging>false</call-logging>
        <container-invoker>org.jboss.ejb.plugins.jrmp.server.JRMPContainerInvoker</container-invoker>
      <container-interceptors>
        <interceptor>org.jboss.ejb.plugins.LogInterceptor</interceptor>
        <interceptor>org.jboss.ejb.plugins.SecurityInterceptor</interceptor>
        <interceptor>org.jboss.ejb.plugins.TxInterceptorCMT</interceptor>
        <interceptor metricsEnabled="true">org.jboss.ejb.plugins.MetricsInterceptor</interceptor>
          <interceptor>org.jboss.ejb.plugins.EntityLockInterceptor</interceptor>
        <interceptor>org.jboss.ejb.plugins.EntityMultiInstanceInterceptor</interceptor>
        <interceptor>org.jboss.ejb.plugins.EntityMultiInstanceSynchronizationInterceptor</interceptor>
      </container-interceptors>
      <instance-pool>org.jboss.ejb.plugins.EntityInstancePool</instance-pool>
        <instance-cache>org.jboss.ejb.plugins.EntityInstanceCache</instance-cache>
        <persistence-manager>org.jboss.ejb.plugins.jaws.JAWSPersistenceManager</persistence-manager>
        <transaction-manager>org.jboss.tm.TxManager</transaction-manager>
        <locking-policy>org.jboss.ejb.plugins.lock.MethodOnlyEJBLock</locking-policy>
        <container-invoker-conf>
                <RMIObjectPort>4444</RMIObjectPort>
                <Optimized>True</Optimized>
        </container-invoker-conf>
        <container-cache-conf>
                <cache-policy>org.jboss.ejb.plugins.LRUEnterpriseContextCachePolicy</cache-policy>     
                                <cache-policy-conf>
                                        <min-capacity>50</min-capacity>
                                        <max-capacity>1000</max-capacity>
                                        <overager-period>300</overager-period>
                                        <max-bean-age>600</max-bean-age>
                                        <resizer-period>400</resizer-period>
                                        <max-cache-miss-period>60</max-cache-miss-period>
                                        <min-cache-miss-period>1</min-cache-miss-period>
                                        <cache-load-factor>0.75</cache-load-factor>
                                </cache-policy-conf>
                </container-cache-conf>
                        <container-pool-conf>
                                <MaximumSize>100</MaximumSize>
                                <MinimumSize>10</MinimumSize>
                        </container-pool-conf>
                        <commit-option>B</commit-option>
        </container-configuration>




> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of tom
> yeh
> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 8:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: Bug in
> EntityMultiInstanceSynchronizationInterceptor.java ?
>
>
> >you can save a lot of loading time if you
> >could check to see if the data stored in the
> >EntityContext is still in sync with the db row.
>
> Dain, you already answered the reason for Option B.
> However, when you said "very little we can reuse", you seems to
> assume CMP. In our cases, we use Option B and BMP that uses
> versioning for optimistic lock.
>
> Surprisedly, in the current implementation of JBoss, our
> optimistic lock not only gets nothing, but even hurts the
> performance (because an extra select must be issued).
>
> Please re-think the priority to support Option B.
>
> _________________________________________________________
> View thread online: http://main.jboss.org/thread.jsp?forum=66&thread=12462
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to