Yes, it is the same work if you are going to specify both. The real benefit comes from being able to specify <schema-name> in the defaults section.
-dain Ignacio Coloma wrote: > I don't see how that is different than using MYSPACE.MYTABLE. Same > amount of code for the user, but you would have to support Yet Another > Feature. IMHO it's the same to write: > > <SCHEMA>myschema</SCHEMA> > <TABLE>mytable</TABLE> > > than > > <TABLE>myschema.mytable</TABLE> > > Do other environments support this? This should be a common problem. As > far as I remember Delphi left you alone on this one. > > On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 15:56, Dain Sundstrom wrote: > >>This looks like a hack to me. Should we consider adding a schema-name >>element to the table configuration? By this I mean that where ever we >>have table-name in the jbosscmp-jdbc.xml file we can have an optional >>schema-name element. Also in the getTables call in we would pass the >>schema name as the second argument. >> >>Does this make since? >> >>Does anyone else have an opinion on this? >> >>-dain >> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> >>>Maybe you could take only the last period delimited token (meaning in >>> >>>MYSCHEMA.MYTABLE use MYTABLE) as the tablename when you must be using >>> >>>only a table name, not a qualified tablename. I would expect that >>> >>>most RDBMS products, open or closed source, use this convention of "." >>> >>>delimiting tokens in table and column names. >>> >>>Cheers >>> >>> >>> >>>>From: Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>Date: 2002/04/15 Mon AM 10:40:32 EDT >>>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Problem in JDBCStartCommand.java >>>> >>>>JL@esial wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Hello, >>>>> >>>>>I am using JBoss 3.0.0beta2(200204150942) on Win2k SP2. >>>>>The function tableExists in this class makes the following jdbc call: >>>>>rs = dmd.getTables(con.getCatalog(), null, tableName, null); >>>>> >>>>>I am using DB2 as dbms, and this piece of code will not work if >>>>> >>>>>tableName contains a prefix. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>Why would it have a prefix? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Indeed, I have to configure my >>>>> >>>>>jbosscmp-jdbc.xml ejb/table mappings like that: >>>>><table-name>MYSCHEMA.MYTABLE</table-name> >>>>>to get the SQL statements work properly with DB2. But then the >>>>> >>>>>tableExists method will always return false since it takes >>>>> >>>>>MYSCHEMA.MYTABLE as tableName. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>JBossCMP tries it's best to autogenerate tables, but it can not solve >>>>all problems. I shoot for 80%. If you need an exact mapping, you will >>>>have to create the tables by hand (you should also do this before >>>>sending the application to production). >>>> >>>>If you have a *SIMPLE* solution that works on all of the major >>>>commercial and all opensource DBs, then I am open to the suggestion/ patch. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Is there an easy way to set a tablename prefix or even a schema >>>>> >>>>>name in jbosscmp-jdbc.xml ? Right now, I think I will have to >>>>> >>>>>patch my own code, but I believe many people out there using >>>>> >>>>>DB2 or Oracle might encounter the same problem. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>I don't think others have this problem, as you are the first to report >>>>it as a problem. >>>> >>>>-dain >>>> >>>> >>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>Jboss-development mailing list >>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Jboss-development mailing list >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
