I think the claims of this being requested by users are suspect. Marc presented some alternatives in the London training, and this one won a vote. I don't think that means anyone asked for it or would find it useful. It means it looked good after Marc's presentation.
Anyway, I think there is a real bug nearby that we need to fix. See http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=46&thread=13456&start=0&msRange=15 (hope the link works) If a jar file references a nonexistent jar file in the manifest classpath entry, something (the scanner???) goes haywire and keeps trying to deploy the ./deploy directory as if it is a package. Presumably there is a missing existence check somewhere. Larry, you into looking at this? thanks david jencks On 2002.04.21 18:44:37 -0400 Larry Sanderson wrote: > > This is insanity... how is renumbering your deployment files > > simipler/easier/faster/better than opening up a config file and listing > the > > order there? > > There is already a hacked sorting in the URLDeploymentScanner... but it > stops at extension comparison. This proposition extends that just a > little > to give the users more control and more choices (with this, > configuration-phobes would not have to modify the config file). Maybe it > is > not useful to everyone (I'm positive that I will not need this in my > current > job), but Marc has mentioned that many users did express this as a need. > I > don't really care, but if you want it, I am willing to do it. > > -Larry > > > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
