> But this thread was started by you, whose original complaint was that it is > difficult to configure packaged archives. The answer is staring you in the > face and you can't see it... Deploy these as exploded archives, and modify > the configurations whenever you want.
I don't want to manage the exploded archive. I want to manage the .sar and .xml... 2 files vs. who knows how many inside of an exploded archive. > That's crap, and you know it. If you're building a new house you can put > up > with a shitty apartment for a little while. You should know better than that if you are as good of a designer as you pimp yourself to be. If you are building a new house does that mean that you remodel your current shit hole so you have room for your new crap while you are building your new house? Do you also do that while you are trying to sell the shit hole? No and no... If there was a need for the hack because the system was failing with out it... perhaps. As was the reasomn for the sorting crap in the first place. You are adding a feature as a hack to an already functioning system... while we are trying to go final... which is just plain stupid. If you want this feature I say put in a seperate component... that is a safer hack than changing UDS at this point in the game. > Where are you coming from here? I have already expressed great interest in > fixing the root of the problem. What I am presenting is a solution that > will get us through until the process is complete. Yes I understand you are interested in helping, and for that I am greatful... in fact so much that I will appologize that I have gotten so heated in the past emails with you... But your solution seems inapproproate given where this version is in its release timeline given that it does not fix anything, it only adds feature. So I think the safest way to add the feature with out changing the stability of the system would be to add it as a replacement component. This allows you to make use of it, as well as others. > Fine. I give up - unless anyone else requests this and it is agreed that a > hack is OK for now, I will not check this in. I'm going to bed. Make it an optional replacement for UDS or leave it for 3.1 to run as a peer to UDS when dependency system is fixed. --jason ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
