Your opinion is heard but I find it lacking in reason since criticizing Jetty source code integration based on JDK 1.4 usage is not a Jetty specific issue. Its also off the mark in that you are not doing the integration so why bitch about it. The Jetty people are doing a great job with the integration and your opinion on this subject is completely unreasonable.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:04 AM Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Re: JDK 1.4 support? > > > IMO it would be better to integrate Jetty as binary, so that we > don't > > > have to keep the build systems in syncs in addition to the sources. > > > This will make it much easier to update when Jetty updates too. > > > > This never works nicely as both JBoss and Jetty have frequent > > releases. So you end up tracking JBoss X + Jetty Y + WebAppService Z, > > so you have three version numbers to track. > > We have to do the same thing for sources... only it is more like a 5 > file binary update instead of a source merge/import instead of a ~20-50 > source files or more. > > We work closely enough with you and the other Jetty folks that if we > find a bug we get the fix put into the Jetty tree directly. If for some > reason there was not enough time to rev Jetty before a JBoss release, > then we can simply check out the Jetty sources, make the fix and use the > resulting binaries for the release. > > > > Plus there are branding and support issues - JBG wants to have > > the whole J2EE source etc. > > Blah, blah, blah. I don't see any sense in this. As far as I can tell > importing sources only creates more work for little benefit. > > > > Finally I'll soon be doing a license change so that Jetty under > > JBoss is LGPL as opposed to the artistic license that it is > > currently under. > > Groovy. =] > > Any ways, I don't really expect my opinion to sway anyone to change; It > never really does, unless I put up a hearty fight for it... And I don't > plan on fighting for this, but I do hope that reason settles into the > equation eventually. > > --jason ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber Inc. Don't miss the IM event of the season | Special offer for OSDN members! JabConf 2002, Aug. 20-22, Keystone, CO http://www.jabberconf.com/osdn _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development