Hiram Chirino wrote:
> Anyways. JMS need bi-directional invocations (BADLY). Should this
> become a requirement for the other invokers??
I completely disagree. There is no reason server to client
communication has to go over the back channel of a client to server
invoker. It is a nice feature but should not be a requirement. For
example, I may want a system that uses RMI for client to server and
Juxta for server to client. To me it is just another RPC. This is why
I want JMX on the client side, so I can reuse any invoker for the server
to client (or client to client) communication.
-dain
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing
your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte
Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
- [JBoss-dev] new PooledInvoker: speeds u... Bill Burke
- RE: [JBoss-dev] new PooledInvoker:... marc fleury
- RE: [JBoss-dev] new PooledInvo... Hiram Chirino
- RE: [JBoss-dev] new Pooled... Bill Burke
- RE: [JBoss-dev] new Po... Sacha Labourey
- RE: [JBoss-dev] n... Hiram Chirino
- RE: [JBoss-dev] new Po... Hiram Chirino
- RE: [JBoss-dev] n... Bill Burke
- RE: [JBoss-de... Hiram Chirino
- RE: [JBoss-dev] new Pooled... Dain Sundstrom
- RE: [JBoss-dev] new Po... Hiram Chirino
- Re: [JBoss-dev] n... Victor Langelo
- Re: [JBoss-de... Scott M Stark
- RE: [JBos... Bill Burke
- RE: [JBos... Hiram Chirino
- RE: [JBos... Bill Burke
- RE: [JBos... Hiram Chirino
- Re: [JBos... Emerson Cargnin - SICREDI Serviços
- Re: [JBos... Dain
- RE: [JBos... Laurent Etiemble