> Hiram Chirino wrote: > > Anyways. JMS need bi-directional invocations (BADLY). Should this > > become a requirement for the other invokers?? > > I completely disagree. There is no reason server to client > communication has to go over the back channel of a client to server
I might have said this before, but there is one reason it's a nice feature: This allows callback to clients that are sitting behind a firewall. > invoker. It is a nice feature but should not be a requirement. For > example, I may want a system that uses RMI for client to server and > Juxta for server to client. To me it is just another RPC. This is why > I want JMX on the client side, so I can reuse any invoker for the server > to client (or client to client) communication. Yep.. I guess that's what I'm complaining about. I want to have invokers on the client side too. I want JMS call backs to go via an invoker too. I can't do that today because we don't do client side invokers. Regards, Hiram > > -dain ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
