> Matt Munz wrote: > > Marc, > > > > If you're writing tissue-paper code (write once, never > modify, throw > > away when broken), "script kiddie" languages are great. > > If not, be prepared to eat it in the long run on man > > hours / maintennance. > > And remember that eating used tissue-paper is never a good thing.
LOL yeah. That being said I think the approach is not bad, you know me. Bad code that works that is great! I wish we did more of that in java in general too much "MVC" too much "model 2" too much "separation of concerns" too much wanking if you ask me. Same for JBoss sometimes. Keep it simple and get it working. Good for the kiddies. There is an equilibrium between the mess that results and the rigid approach most java purist take. If we can strike that balance with nukes on jboss.... marcf ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
