Scott,
Thanks. I think the common point to both strategies is the MBean -> XML serializer.
I'll get started on that.
For what date is the 3.2 release planned?
- Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mon 1/13/2003 5:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MBean persistence?
This should not be a black and white option. We need a logical seperation from
configuration from the deployment at the JBoss core layer. If someone wants
to persist configuration with the deployment, including runtime mods let them.
If someone wants to access webdav, jdbc, jndi, etc. for the configuration,
let them. Quit being purists and address the administration problem. This does
need to be in 3.2.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dain Sundstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MBean persistence?
...
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte
are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE
Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues.
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
<<winmail.dat>>
