When it looks worth putting out. I was thinking the end of the month but given that I'm training the entire last week it won't be until the first week of Feb.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Munz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 2:38 PM Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] MBean persistence? > Scott, > > Thanks. I think the common point to both strategies is the MBean -> XML serializer. > I'll get started on that. > > For what date is the 3.2 release planned? > > - Matt > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Mon 1/13/2003 5:07 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MBean persistence? > > > > This should not be a black and white option. We need a logical seperation from > configuration from the deployment at the JBoss core layer. If someone wants > to persist configuration with the deployment, including runtime mods let them. > > If someone wants to access webdav, jdbc, jndi, etc. for the configuration, > let them. Quit being purists and address the administration problem. This does > need to be in 3.2. > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Scott Stark > Chief Technology Officer > JBoss Group, LLC > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
