> yes, if you take a look at the code, before the switch > statement that distinguishes the cases between the different > transaction attributes, we start by a tx.suspend() and, a few > lines after, a tx.resume() if it was a REQUIRES tag for example, etc.
I know I wrote the original version of the code. What I argued Nth times is that tx.suspend() should just be implemented with threadLocalVariable.set(null); meaning that we disassociate the thread from the TX. The event "thread dis-association" is not relevant to anyone else, not even to the TX. The TX DOESN'T CARE that it is associated with n threads or not. Man I really need to write that TX-lite spec. It is a fucking mess in your heads right now :) marcf > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de > > marc fleury Envoye : lundi, 27 janvier 2003 16:52 > > A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Stefan Reich' > > Objet : RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: how's ecperf going? > > > > > > > > * TxInterceptorCMP suspends and resumes a transaction in all > > > > cases, sometimes even twice. This can be very expensive, > > > > especially with global transactions. > > > > > > > > > > ?? Can you point this out? > > > > for the nth time we are having this discussion. > > > > NO, the 'suspend/resume' is NOT A LIFECYCLE EVEN ON THE > TRANSACTION. > > That says that there is no distribution of that event. S/R > just says > > that we DIS-ASSOCIATE the thread from the transaction and > that's it. > > If a TM implements notifications of this, it is A BUG. > > > > marcf > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = > Something 2 See! > > http://www.vasoftware.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something > 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
