I agree. As I begin the development of JMS/JBoss 4.0, I'm, frankly, confused as to which direction to go concerning the interceptor framework--which project is THE project? There is some great work being done right now by a variety of people on this problem, but I have no idea how it all fits together--if it fits together. I wish we could settle this problem, agree on which direction we are going, and then get the code base stabilized so those of us building services that will use THE framework can have the confidence that we're working with the right one and that it works as advertised.
Thanks, Nathan -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott M Stark Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 1:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework Woa, before we have a full fledged interceptor war show up in main what is the status of the various JMX, AOP, etc interceptors and associated frameworks? It seems like several people are running around writing this without demonstrating how it applies to the existing services. A simple example is how do I expose the existing JNDI naming service via RMI/JRMP and RMI/HTTP with that ability to introduce security and persistence? xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
