The AOP case is even more similar to the DP if you think of AOP like this:
If the AOP intrumented methods are: < Interceptors are: [] The original (but renamed) object methods are: ( The object is: O An AOP stack then is: <[](O Which is almost the same as the DP case: |[](O Regards, Hiram > If an object is > > |(O > > | is the interface > ( are the methods to the object > O is the actual implementation > > or > (O for a pojo > > then using > > |[](O > is the DP approach where the [] interception is like > the current EJB > implementation and what Hiram was proposing to do in > the very beginning > > ([]O > is the current AOP approach for POJO's. > > > There shouldn't be a war in these two approaches and > the interface one > should systematically use DP > > marcf > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
