> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott
> M Stark
> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:35 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] XSLSubDeployer improvements and jca 1.5 mdb
> deployment
>
>
> The XSLSubdeployer is acting as an interceptor and a deployer.
> The transformation
> activity needs to be factored out from the subdeployer behavior.
> It makes no sense
> to add subdeployers that really do not deploy anything simply to
> achive the side effect
> of an interceptor.
>
> Futher, the deployers need to stop dealing with the descriptor
> xml document parsing
> and instead operate on the descriptor metadata object model. This
> allows for a 4.0
> deployer to deal with previous version deployment decriptors as
> the transformation
> from 3.0, 3.2, 4.0 deployment descriptors to the current
> deployment metadata is
> done outside of the deployer by a filter.
>

Not sure I like this idea.  Tell me why we need to support 3.2 and 3.0
descriptors in 4.0?  I'd much rather a 3.2 component crap out gracefully in
4.0 than have to maintain 3 separate configuration mechanisms.

I do like the idea of having a metamodel separate from XML parsing.  BUT
STILL, it is quite easy to navigate the current metadata/XML marriage that
now exists in current configuration.  Are you sure we're actually gaining
any maintainability by changing the status quo?

Bill



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to