An mbean is still an object metamodel. Exposing this as an mbean is a seperate issue.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > I'm not convinced we are, I am unconvinced anything more than mbeans is > necessary. Configuring mbeans that do the work directly has the nice > property that you can see and change what the properties are directly > in the jmx console. > > > please tell me why we need point > > pointers into the documents of different deployments? > > This has been there since the beginning of jb4. The ra.xml from an > adapter is transformed into xmbean descriptors, which need to be > included or accessed somehow when an mbean based on one of them is > deployed, i.e. when a connection factory is deployed. The change I > just made is to let you get to more than one xml doc in a single > deployment info, something the current metadata classes do in hardcoded > java. > > BTW, I am not completely thrilled with the complexity of the xsl > stylesheets I'm currently using and am looking for something simpler. > Apache Commons Digester looks like a possibility. > > david ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
