anonymous wrote : | This change does have ramifications on the behavior of the jbossxb object factories because the latter form is throwing away object relationships.
I don't understand what you are getting at? The only reason to name a bean is if you want it in the registry such that it can be: 1) referenced on external dependencies 2) a shared instance injected across beans 3) invoked using detached invocations on the Bus. Otherwise, the two approaches should be logically equivalent. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870637#3870637 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3870637 ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
