I don't understand why you say this. MBeans are configurable from the outside - that is one of their selling points. And a standard JMX interface does all the work of accessing the configurable attributes. Furthermore, before you start up JBoss, you can modify the attributes (in different files, depending on which version you are using.) What more do you want?
And if you are looking to configure EJBs from the outside, that is what deployment descriptors are for. And if that isn't enough, your EJB provider can configure through properties files. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon Haugsand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 7:58 AM Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] JBOSS - Components library > * wonder sonic > > This just what I talked about, to centralize the > > development of such components, I mean *FREE* > > components working without spending one hour to > > configure it... sort of Plug and Play components ;) > > Is this possible? Is it even a good idea? > > I agree in the sense that any free downloaded component should work > out of the box, but most of us would want to reconfigure most of the > components to make it fit. Java isn't such a good language to use to > configure things from the outside. > > > -- > Jon Haugsand, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Norges Bank, <http://www.norges-bank.no> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > JBoss-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
