Have you tried your tests out on 3.0.4 yet?
Some CMR performance optimisations made it into 3.0.4, because we desperately needed them for our own application.
Steve Coy
On Wednesday, November 6, 2002, at 06:37 AM, Luttrell, Peter wrote:
Nope it's defiantly cached.
The first time it takes almost 12,000ms to build the beans. Yes that is 10
times slower...course it does have to initiate the db connections, and the
db isn't very fast.
.peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:dain@;daingroup.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 7:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Entity Bean Performance Tuning Help
Luttrell, Peter wrote:
It is faster. I tried it in response to danch's message early in thethread.
Thus I have the same question (which no one commented on): "Time ~1200ms
isa lot better then the original 2200, but can this still be acceptable forI think you will get the same answer, run a profiler and find out what
reading ~10 fields from 750ejbs that are 100% cached?"
Here is the email in this thread reporting the results:
is taking the 1200 ms. It should be obvious. If you can't fix whatever
is taking all the time, come back and complain about "x" being really
slow. My guess is the data isn't cached and it is taking 1199 ms to get
it from the database and 1 ms to build the value object.
-dain
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
