We are in the process of creating our own CMS framework. Actually a direct port of PostNuke. When that is complete we'll switch back to Java land.
Bill > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christopher > Blunck > Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 11:32 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Why PHP why not JSP? > > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 11:16:38PM -0500, sherlock costello wrote: > > >Does anybody (other than me) find it ironic that the leading > open source > > >application server project uses PHP on it's home page instead of JSP? > > Absolutely. I think it's insane. > > Not to fuel the flames thus far (it seems like there is a spectrum of > respondants, some of which favor the move, some of which criticize it, and > some of which are indifferent) but . . . :) > > TheServerSide.com folks have written their own application to > manage stories, > responses, threads, etc. It's pretty cool, and I'm impressed to > see reporters > actually explore the domain in which they report. I read > articles in magazines, > but I have no idea if the author even downloaded, compiled, wrote > some client > code, and truly evaluated a potential product. Or if they simply > browsed the > online API and read some class docs. To that end, I have a lot > of respect for > TheServerSide.com folks for (as somebody else pointed out) eating > their own > dog food and truly being in the trenches when it comes to > emerging technology. > > Example: They wanted to review clustering. What did they do? > They clustered > *their* production website using Oracle's app server and WebLogic. After > clustering, they wrote their review. Their review has a hell of a lot of > credibility when on the left hand side of the browser window it reads > "Running on bea WebLogic" and after a refresh it says "Running on Oracle's > WebSphere." I mean come on . . . you can't get much better than that. > > Likewise, I think JBoss should be in similar water and ... eating > their own > dog food. Yes I am familiar with the open source J2EE > architecture (wrt Jetty > or Tomcat being a servlet engine, and JBoss is an application server that > can use Jetty or Tomcat, yadda yadda yadda). But it seems to me > that ... if > you really stand behind your movement you'd be using the tools in > your domain > to solve your problems. Or, if (as I am hearing) the current > tools are not > appropriate, make a new tool. Or change the existing tools to be more > appropriate - that's the whole beauty of open source! > > Somewhat related to another poster's comment about MS Marketing, I'm just > waiting for a smartass coworker to read a post somewhere (/. perhaps) that > says that JBoss.org "doesn't trust their product enough to run their own > development site" and then come shouting to me about how the project I've > evangelized over the past year (over WebLogic and Oracle) isn't > up to snuff. > Please don't let those jabronis do that. Please... > > > > -c > > -- > 11:20am up 81 days, 2:36, 1 user, load average: 0.06, 0.53, 2.13 > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! > http://www.vasoftware.com > _______________________________________________ > JBoss-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
