On Wednesday, Jan 15, 2003, at 03:44 Europe/Amsterdam, Ed Brown wrote:
Yeah unfortunately this is true :-( I have not much choice to go for it and hope the best though :-(Quoting "Gary S. Cuozzo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:The JBoss implementation of JMS is not optimal. That's a nice way of saying that it is crap.hey all, I'm doing some testing on my application, and having some issues with the JMS service.
I strongly suggest you investigate ways of using other JMS implementations with JBoss. It is not worth the effort to use JBoss's implementation for a production system.
I did notice that using the JVM IL works much more reliable.
The problems are vague, and I really need to submit good bug reports. Remember that the problems will not be looked at until they are defined and put in the bug database. So open those log files and put the relevant parts in a bugreport.
But what I really wanted to ask ... Has anyone looked at JORAM http://www.objectweb.org/joram/ or UberMQ http://www.ubermq.com/. They are both LGPL so license-wise should be ok to integrate/use in a JBoss project.
Due to a limited project budget I cannot look at commercial options, but maybe one of these two have potential.
S.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte
are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE
Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues.
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
