Oh my God. 4000 EMOTE emails.
wow. Howard Ryan -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard Dobson Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 8:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JDEV] Emoticons: guidelines I dont know but that is what the person was suggesting ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:07 AM Subject: Re: [JDEV] Emoticons: guidelines > Why would you want to put inline x elements in the xhtml segment??? > > - Dave > > > Richard Dobson wrote: > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Julian Fitzell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:23 PM > > Subject: Re: [JDEV] Emoticons: guidelines > > > > > Sure, but then in either case why are we using an <img> tag? Sure we > > > can use a tag called <img> if we want, but why not an x tag with an > > > appropriate namespace? This doesn't save any bandwidth and now the > > > client can't use and HTML widget to display XHTML messages because it > > > won't understand the URN... > > > > Yes I know, I forsaw the problem that a client may not understand the urn, > > thats why I like my way of defining appropriate replacements, if a client > > does not understand the x element, it can just ignore it, and it wont break > > displaying of the message it will just come out as the original text. Also > > im not sure if inline x elements are even allowed in the xhtml segment. _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
