Hmm ... so we can have <img:emoticon src="smiley">, and <img:genicon src="beer"> ... interesting idea. . .
Yeah, I think that will keep the implementation reasonably clean, while making people who want to treat emoticons differently happy. Thanks for the idea :-) - Dave Julian Fitzell wrote: > > No, I was supporting your proposal... just didn't come out sounding that > way :) I didn't mean the x tags had to be inline, just that I prefer > having an x tag with an appropriate namespace that identifies it as an > emoticon rather than a standard <img> tag that doesn't tell you that. > > Julian > > Richard Dobson wrote: > > I dont know but that is what the person was suggesting > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:07 AM > > Subject: Re: [JDEV] Emoticons: guidelines > > > > > > > >>Why would you want to put inline x elements in the xhtml segment??? > >> > >> - Dave > >> > >> > >>Richard Dobson wrote: > >> > >>> > >>>----- Original Message ----- > >>>From: "Julian Fitzell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:23 PM > >>>Subject: Re: [JDEV] Emoticons: guidelines > >>> > >>> > >>>>Sure, but then in either case why are we using an <img> tag? Sure we > >>>>can use a tag called <img> if we want, but why not an x tag with an > >>>>appropriate namespace? This doesn't save any bandwidth and now the > >>>>client can't use and HTML widget to display XHTML messages because it > >>>>won't understand the URN... > >>> > >>>Yes I know, I forsaw the problem that a client may not understand the > >> > > urn, > > > >>>thats why I like my way of defining appropriate replacements, if a > >> > > client > > > >>>does not understand the x element, it can just ignore it, and it wont > >> > > break > > > >>>displaying of the message it will just come out as the original text. > >> > > Also > > > >>>im not sure if inline x elements are even allowed in the xhtml segment. > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > jdev mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev > > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Beta4 Productions (http://www.beta4.com) > > _______________________________________________ > jdev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev > _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
