On 6/27/07, Michal 'vorner' Vaner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 01:11:03PM +0200, Norman Rasmussen wrote:
> On 6/27/07, Sergei Golovan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > You're right. And the question is: "How to escape it? Can escaping be
> > done unambiguously?"
>
>
> Yes, but only if you already know the split.
Is there a way the server part could contain @? I hope a domain name
can't contain it. I would take the last @ as the actual separator and
leave all the before as just part of the node (same as with email, where
you can have address like @@host.com, where the local name on host is
really @).
The last @ may be in a resource part.
Do you think there may be a problem with this approach?
Valig JIDs are always split into three parts unambiguously. As far as
I thought, XEP-0106 purpose is to allow invalid JIDs to be shown to a
user (hiding real complicated escaped JID). But it seems to fail in
this. So, let this XEP serve another goal - interoperability between
XMPP network and the others.
--
Sergei Golovan
