On Thursday 27 March 2008, Pedro Melo wrote: > On Mar 26, 2008, at 1:29 PM, David Janes wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Kevin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Greg Wilson > >> > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> There's been a fair bit of discussion in the last couple of > >>> days on the Python SoC mailing list about how useful it would > >>> be to have an XMPP server in Python > >> > >> Why would having one written in Python in particular be useful to > >> you? > >> > >> /K > > > > 1) because many of us work in Python environments and would like to > > continue to do so > > 2) because Python kicks ass and thus there are many Python programmers > > and thus once we get the framework in place is likely to be used and > > extended > > 3) because this is a noticeable deficiency in Python's otherwise > > excellent support of Internet protocols > > May I suggest that instead of a full server, you implement a XMPP > router instead? > > The difference for me is that a XMPP router does not have a session > manager. It only has: > > * S2S: for federation; > * XEP-0114 and XEP-0225 support. > > This would allow anyone to write a component in any language they > want, and the make it available in the XMPP network without having to > run a full server. > > This is something that I think does not exist, and that many people > could use.
We're already writing a full server (it's a course project right now), so I think it's too late to turn it into a router. However, I really like your idea. After the hand-off, if I have time, I'll try to get some work done in that area. Cheers, Dmitri