On Mar 11, 2009, at 4:10 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On 3/11/09 10:00 AM, Pedro Melo wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mar 11, 2009, at 3:54 PM, Remko Tronçon wrote: >> >>>>> Or would @pt.jabber.org IM accounts exist also? >>>> I'm not sure yet -- we're exploring this idea together. :) >>> I wouldn't offer pt.jabber.org for IM accounts, exactly for the >>> reasons you mentioned (you would have to migrate if you move >>> somewhere >>> etc.). Maybe I lack national pride, but I wouldn't want a >>> be.jabber.org account, just plain, short, and simple jabber.org :-) >> >> Yeah... I can see right now being able to support pt.jabber.org >> services (socks, turn, translation, etc), but running a full IM >> service, not so much. > > Yes, it's a lot of work to support a full IM service. :) But if we > make > jabber.org too popular then we need to put more time into it. We'll > need > clustering at the least, because running everything on one machine in > Iowa would not be enough.
Not sure what the solution is here... Need some thinking time. >> But I also understand that other, who already have a bigger >> community, >> might want that to. > > Perhaps it's enough for now to figure out worldwide clustering of the > jabber.org address space and deployment of minimal xmpp services (not > hosting IM accounts) for bootstrapping of SOCKS5 and TURN relays. Global clustering of jabber.org address space is wicked... hmms :) Best regards, -- Pedro Melo Blog: http://www.simplicidade.org/notes/ XMPP ID: [email protected] Use XMPP! _______________________________________________ JDev mailing list Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
