On 1/25/10 10:43 PM, Mike Mahoney wrote: >> >> There is definitely interest on my side. I will basically have a >> single client that other processes connect to via IPC - the cleanest >> solution would be resources, although the client could always open up >> new connections. In any case it would be great for scenarios like mine >> (basically delegation). >> > > FWIW, there's interest on my side as well, but I realize I missed the > previous discussion. Our client is device based and it would be nice if one > JID could be used to represent multiple resources at one site. We currently > get around it by tracking resources at the client and routing messages based > on content. I think it is an important feature for non-user based clients.
I'm not opposed to defining this as an extension, but I don't really have time to work on it. That said, we could probably pull the text out of an earlier version of draft-ietf-xmpp-3920bis or its predecessor. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ JDev mailing list Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org _______________________________________________
