Dnia 2010-01-29, pią o godzinie 07:52 -0700, Peter Saint-Andre pisze: > You mean http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/private-muc.html I suppose. > It's not clear to me if we absolutely need multi-resource support in > order to have private MUCs. And I wouldn't want to have a dependency > on the server to provide private MUCs anyway.
One may always establish multiple connections to bring up more resources. But I think resource binding is way simpler method. BTW: What was the exact reasons for dropping it? I didn't find it nor confusing, nor hard to implement. Pros: - does not add another flow, just reuse existing one - easy to implement (servers already support one resource bind and multiple connections from one client) - very straightforward once you get what resource bind is (and you need to bind one) Cons: - ??? -- Tomasz Sterna Instant Messaging & EDI Consultant Open Source Developer http://tomasz.sterna.tv/ http://www.xiaoka.com/ _______________________________________________ JDev mailing list Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org _______________________________________________
