On 1/29/10 6:39 AM, Tomasz Sterna wrote: > Dnia 2010-01-25, pon o godzinie 14:40 -0700, Peter Saint-Andre pisze: >> The multi-resource stuff seemed like a good idea at the time but >> people >> on the XMPP WG discussion list were concerned about adding complexity. >> We could, of course, still define it as an XMPP extension if there's >> interest. > > There is. Dropping it kills private MUC which is an interesting feature > for the privacy nuts. Well... it's an interesting feature anyway. :-)
You mean http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/private-muc.html I suppose. It's not clear to me if we absolutely need multi-resource support in order to have private MUCs. And I wouldn't want to have a dependency on the server to provide private MUCs anyway. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ JDev mailing list Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
